Welcome to

Lancashire Online Knowledge

Image Credit Header image: Artwork by Professor Lubaina Himid, CBE. Photo: @Denise Swanson


Characterising Challenging Behaviour Following Stroke: A Retrospective Chart Review of Presentation, Management, and Outcomes

Lamont, Scott orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-2497-1314, Lightbody, Catherine Elizabeth orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-5016-3471, Ghosh, Malabika orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-2540-6547, Jefferson, Rebecca Louise orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-4594-0536, Su, Ting-Li orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-3311-4998 and Watkins, Caroline Leigh orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-9403-3772 (2026) Characterising Challenging Behaviour Following Stroke: A Retrospective Chart Review of Presentation, Management, and Outcomes. Nursing Reports, 16 (2). p. 53.

[thumbnail of VOR]
Preview
PDF (VOR) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

209kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16020053

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Challenging behaviour post-stroke can complicate care and disrupt rehabilitation, yet its presentation and management are underreported. This study explored how such behaviours were documented in clinical records and managed in stroke settings, and how care delivery and discharge outcomes were documented in this context. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted across two NHS stroke units, covering all admissions between March and April 2022. Patient records were reviewed to capture demographic, clinical, and behavioural information, together with details relating to management and discharge. Challenging behaviour was identified retrospectively from clinical documentation during routine care. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. Results: Forty-eight stroke admissions were examined, with challenging behaviour documented in thirteen patients (27%). Eleven had ischaemic stroke, with moderate severity common (n = 6), while inattention/neglect (n = 5) and infection (n = 4) were also documented. Behaviours were commonly recorded as confusion or agitation, and predominantly by nursing staff. Challenges to care delivery were documented in six of these patients, and additional professional input was provided for seven. Discharge delays were documented in patients with challenging behaviour, and the median length of stay was notably longer for this group (19 days compared with 7). Documentation of cognitive or delirium screening was uncommon. Conclusions: Challenging behaviour was documented in over a quarter of acute stroke admissions and was documented alongside greater care complexity and longer hospital stays. These preliminary descriptive findings from a small sample indicate a need for further exploration to better characterise challenging behaviour following stroke and its implications for care.


Repository Staff Only: item control page