Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the intraday and interday reliability of seated horizontal upper body (UB) isometric push and pull tests performed with the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer. Methods: Fifty-two recreationally active individuals (41 men, 11 women; 25.0 ± 6.1 years) completed two sessions 48 h apart, each comprising three maximal-effort push and pull trials at 90° elbow flexion using a custom-built rig with the attached dynamometer. Peak force (PF), peak rate of force development (RFD), impulse, and time-to-PF were extracted from 1200 Hz force–time data. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), standard error of measure (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: PF demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97–0.99) with low absolute error (CV < 6%; MDC = 128–149 N). Impulse showed good-to-excellent reliability (ICC = 0.90–0.94; CV < 10%; MDC ≈ 755–790 N·s), whereas RFD displayed good reliability but greater variability (ICC = 0.80–0.81; CV < 20%; MDC = 2574–2925 N·s−1). Time-to-PF was the least reliable (ICC = 0.68–0.71; CV > 24%; MDC = 1.5–1.7 s). Conclusions: Horizontal isometric push and pull tests using the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer provide reliable measures of PF and impulse for athlete profiling and tracking substantial longitudinal changes. Peak RFD may be cautiously used for broad cross-sectional comparisons, although its higher variability limits precision in distinguishing smaller inter-individual differences and appears less sensitive to within-individual changes. Time-to-PF demonstrated insufficient reliability for practical application.